numbers

Avion Rewards Class Action

Class Action Filed Against Royal Bank of Canada for Price Dripping and Double Ticketing

On August 19, 2025, Klein Lawyers filed a class action against the Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) over its pricing practices in the Avion travel rewards program. The lawsuit concerns RBC’s practice of charging fees in a misleading and unlawful manner.

When an Avion Rewards member books a rewards flight or vacation through the Avion Rewards website or mobile app, a mandatory fee (the “Surcharge”) is added to the price only at the final checkout stage. The prices shown before checkout exclude this Surcharge, creating the false impression that the advertised amount is the total price payable. This conduct amounts to drip pricing and double ticketing, both of which are prohibited under sections 52 and 54 of the Competition Act.

What is drip pricing?
Drip pricing happens when a company advertises a price that is unattainable because of mandatory additional charges. In this case, RBC displayed an initial price that did not include the Surcharge, then added the Surcharge only at checkout, even when no extra services were selected. Under section 52(1.3) of the Competition Act, drip pricing is a false or misleading representation. 

What is double ticketing?
Double ticketing occurs when a company displays two prices for the same product and charges the higher one. Here, RBC displayed one price without the Surcharge and later displayed, and charged, a higher price including the Surcharge. Section 54(1) of the Competition Act prohibits double ticketing, and section 54(2) makes it a criminal offence.

Who is included in the class action?
The class action is brought on behalf of all individuals who booked travel using Avion Rewards and paid a higher price at checkout than was displayed prior to checkout.

Stay informed
If you booked travel through the Avion Rewards program and were charged this Surcharge, and you would like to be kept informed of developments in the case, please complete our inquiry form below.

Court Documents
2025
Inquiry Form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • If you would like to be kept informed of developments in the Avion Rewards Class Action, please complete the inquiry form below. You will be placed in a database of potential class members. By completing this form and submitting it to Klein Lawyers LLP you have not entered into a lawyer-client relationship with Klein Lawyers LLP. Any information you provide to us through the Website will be treated with care and is subject to our Privacy Policy and Website Use Agreement.

  • Please add approximate date(s) of bookings:

    You may withdraw your consent at any time.

Skill, Diligence, and Experience of Counsel

“The negotiations were conducted by plaintiffs’ counsel with experience in class proceedings.”

Sawatzky v. Société Chirurgicale Instrumentarium Inc., 1999 CanLII 6982 at para. 11

“I am satisfied it is apparent from the material, which is complicated, and, I might say very well organized...”

Fischer v. Delgratia Mining Corp, [1999] B.C.J. No. 3149 at para. 23

“Plaintiff’s counsel are senior members of the bar who have extensive experience in personal injury litigation and class actions..”

Knudsen (Guardian of) v. Consolidated Food Brands Inc., 2001 BCSC 1837 at para. 40

“Mr. Klein is experienced and able in relation to class proceedings. Over time he has acquired expertise that permits him to make a valuable contribution...”

Killough v. Canadian Red Cross Society, 2001 BCSC 1745 at para. 28

“The lead class counsel is experienced and has been recognized by the courts in approving settlements in other class actions.”

Fakhri v. Alfalfa’s Canada Inc., 2005 BCSC 1123 at para. 23

“Counsel for the plaintiffs in the various jurisdictions appear to be experienced in class proceedings, and to be recognized as skilled litigators.”

Jeffrey v. Nortel Networks Corp., 2007 BCSC 69 at para. 29

“…Plaintiff’s counsel retained the British Columbia law firm of Klein Lawyers to assist in the litigation. That firm has extensive experience...”

Rideout v. Health Labrador Corp, 2007 NLTD 150 at para. 156

“Klein Lawyers is a litigation firm focusing on class actions. The firm is based in Vancouver but also has a Toronto office.”

McSherry v. Zimmer GMBH, 2012 ONSC 4113 at para. 21

“The proposed Class Counsel have excellent qualifications…”

Parker v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2012 ONSC 3681 at para. 130

“Mr. Klein of Klein Lawyers has over 20 years of experience in the field of class action litigation and has appeared as plaintiffs’ counsel in over 25 certified class actions...”

Stanway v. Wyeth Canada Inc., 2015 BCSC 983 at para. 39

“Class counsel, Klein Lawyers LLP and Kim Orr Barristers P.C., are highly experienced in class action litigation. Both firms have practiced in the specialized area of class action litigation for over 20 years”

Merlo v. R, 2017 FC 533 at para. 34

“British Columbia class counsel took on this case on a contingency basis, and faced a real risk of not being paid at all for their services.”

Jeffrey v. Nortel Networks Corp, 2007 BCSC 69 at para. 73

“Class counsel pursued this litigation to completion on their own rather than with a consortium of counsel from various provinces.”

Merlo v. R, 2017 FC 533 at para. 84

“Klein Lawyers has continuously posted updates about the case on its website during the litigation, and has posted the court decisions...”

Richard v. British Columbia, [2010] B.C.J. No. 1363 at para. 20

“There is little doubt that the lawyers of the firm expended a great deal of time in prosecuting the action, in negotiating a settlement...”

McSherry v. Zimmer GMBH, 2016 ONSC 4606 at para. 38

“…Class counsel undertook an extensive communication plan to advise potential class members of the proposed settlement and to advise them of the...”

Merlo v. R, 2017 FC 533 at para. 12
No Fee Guarantee